Blog

Posted by Jim Blais

Basic Hazardous Gas Monitoring: Assessment and Selection of Ideal Gas Monitoring Technologies

April 30, 2018

Selection of an “ideal gas detection technology” will vary depending upon the individual gas targets involved. The key point is providing continuous safe and reliable detection for every hazardous gas target – with safety actions (shutdown and notifications) performed in conformance with required codes and best practices… within the individual TWA-TLVs and % LEL limits for each specific gas target.

As a Life Safety System, gas detection sensor selection requires an absolute sensor and safety control platform that provides “availability and reliability” to ensure that all safety aspects of the system are operational and “available” at all times. No “covert” or “fail-danger” faults are permitted. All gas sensors and gas detection instruments must be continuously supervised – (via diagnostics) to ensure continuous gas monitoring availability.

Selecting and applying the ideal gas detection technology and approach for each gas target begins by gathering all of the available characteristics and properties of each hazardous gas. Hazardous gas detection technology will almost always require at least two different detection technologies – depending upon the specific gas targets.

Gathering and listing gas targets by gas family (e.g., hydrides, mineral acids, halogens, flammables, inerts, etc.,) with their chemical formulas, synonyms, Chemical Abstract System # s’ and Safety Data Sheets (SDS) is a required starting point.

SDS’ data are essential and provide comprehensive information about a substance or mixture – providing helpful safety information for all – including critical “gas property” data for the target gas or gas mixture. Accidental releases of oxygen deficient (inert) gas sources should also be considered as potential hazards – given their lack of warning properties and immediate risk of asphyxiation.

Hazardous gas detection technology selection is then best determined by a “supplier assessment.”

Assessment parameters for each gas target technology, requires understanding the following

  • Identifying and confirming the most recent and adopted chemical substance alarm levels for each gas target as may be applicable:
    1. Time-Weighted Average - Threshold Limit Values, (TWA-TLV)
    2. Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL)
    3. Short Term Exposure Limit (STEL)
    4. Ceiling
    5. Lethal Concentration 50 (LC50)
    6. Lower Explosion Limit (LEL) or Lower Flammability Limit (LFL)
  • Gas sample detection method (diffusion or extractive):
    1. Diffusion sensor mounting options – (filters, remote sensor, exhaust duct adapter requirements)
    2. Extractive tubing mounting options – (filters, tubing types, maximum tubing lengths by gas family, exhaust duct adapter requirements, gas sample transport time)
  • Sensor / Detection type:
    1. Chemcassette (paper tape)
    2. Electrochemical
    3. Catalytic bead
    4. IR
    5. FTIR
    6. others
  • Calibration and calibration frequency
  • Cross sensitivities (multiple gas responses within gas families)
  • Known Interferences (negative sensor response, sensor poisoning)
  • Full measuring range
  • Lower Detection Limit
  • Lowest Alarm Level
  • Sensor drift and span over a time period
  • Sensor response time to T90
  • Sensor / Transmitter / Instrument – Diagnostic features and capabilities
  • Cost and frequency of consumable replacements (sensors, paper tape, etc.)
  • Power / Utility – UPS Requirements
  • Integration choices (Ethernet/IP, Analog, relays, etc.)

Hazardous Gas Mixtures

It is also necessary to evaluate if binary gas mixtures (where the hazardous component is diluted with a nonhazardous component) remain toxic or flammable.

Toxic Mixtures:

“Lethal concentration fifty” (LC50): Is the concentration of a substance in air; exposure to which, for a specified length of time is expected to cause the death of 50% of the entire defined experimental animal population.

Toxic and highly toxic gases include those gases that have a LC50 of 2,000 parts per million (ppm) or less when rats are exposed for a period of 1 hour or less.

For binary mixtures where the hazardous component is diluted with a nontoxic gas such as an inert gas, the LC50 of the mixture is estimated by use of the methodology contained in CGA P-20.

Using CGA P-20 – 2009 “Standard for Classification of Toxic Gas Mixtures” – for determining gas mixture toxicity:

Flammable Mixtures:

To evaluate the “flammability” of gas mixtures, CGA P23 – 2015 “Standard for Categorizing Gas Mixtures Containing Flammable and Nonflammable Components” provides a table of the common flammable component concentrations (%) in various nonflammable inert mixture types, along with supporting methods, calculations and examples.

LC50 of gas mixtures in ppm = ppm LC50 of toxic component/ppm of toxic component ×1,000,000New Call-to-action

Summary

The selection of gas detection technologies and configuration of the overall hazardous gas monitoring “Safety Instrumented System” as a standalone platform (similar to a Fire Alarm System) is very important as it promotes and simplifies the required periodic testing of the life safety system.

Unlike most “initiating” devices within a fire alarm system, many gas detection sensors include “consumable” components (e.g., electrochemical cells) – whereby the “probability of failure” continuously rises with “operational” time.

It should be understood that “periodic functional testing” of each gas sensor effectively “resets” the probability of the sensor and control platform to “not” perform the required safety functions back to zero. Successful “on demand” detection and performance of the hazardous gas safety system functions are both demonstrated and reassured by… periodic validation testing, fail-safe wiring practices, full diagnostics and UPS power – ensuring “continuous” hazardous gas safety system protection.

If you would like more information about Toxic Gas Monitoring Technologies you can contact me directly via email jblais@Hallam-ICS.com or through our Help Desk

About the Author

Jim is the senior technical lead for Toxic Gas Monitoring Systems (TGMS) with 50 years of experience.  He determines TGMS “user requirements”- evaluates, recommends, selects and applies the best gas detection technologies available – based upon each user’s gas targets.  Jim also provides guidance on harmonizing and utilizing both applicable codes and best practices, selecting ideal sensor locations and developing functional “cause & effect” (CE) gas safety matrices. 

Read   My Hallam Story  

About Hallam-ICS

Hallam-ICS is an engineering and automation company that designs MEP systems for facilities and plants, engineers control and automation solutions, and ensures safety and regulatory compliance through arc flash studies, commissioning, and validation. Our offices are located in Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Vermont and North Carolina and our projects take us world-wide. 

Topics: Toxic Gas Monitoring Systems

Jim Blais

By Jim Blais

Find me on:

April 30, 2018

Next Blog Post